Hepatic resection for isolated breast cancer liver metastasis: A single-center experience
Article information
Abstract
Purpose
The objective of this study was to investigate the outcomes of selected patients with breast cancer liver metastases (BCLM) without extrahepatic metastases after hepatic resection.
Methods
Patients whose imaging findings did not show extrahepatic disease were selected for hepatic resection. If R0 resection was available and the operative risk was low in preoperative tests, the patients underwent surgery.
Results
Between 2011 and 2014, six patients underwent hepatic resection for BCLM. All patients received hepatic resection to achieve an R0 resection. The time interval between initial detection of breast cancer and that of liver metastases in the patients, excluding one patient with synchronous metastases, was 55.2 months. Major liver resection was performed in four patients. Differences were observed in the hormone receptor status between the primary breast tumor and liver metastases; however, no difference was observed in the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status. The 1-year and 3-year overall survival rates after hepatic resection were 100% and 83.3%, respectively. The 1-year and 3-year disease free survival rates after hepatic resection were 66.7% and 50.0%, respectively.
Conclusion
Curative resection may be considered as one of the multimodality treatments for BCLM. It shows benefit in selected patients; its selection criteria needs to be investigated.
INTRODUCTION
In contrast to the well described guidelines for hepatic resection of colorectal cancer and neuroendocrine liver metastases, surgical resection of breast cancer liver metastases (BCLM) is only considered in highly selected patients [1,2]. Treatment for BCLM is mainly based on the physician’s experience because of limited clinical benefits of hepatic resection.
Liver metastases occur frequently in women with metastatic breast cancer, which is mostly associated with extrahepatic metastasis. Metastases that occur only in the liver constitute 4%–5% of metastatic breast cancer cases, and the available treatments for them are limited and ineffective [3–5]. Treatment options for BCLM are hormonal therapy, chemoradiotherapy, radio-frequency ablation therapy, selective internal radiation therapy, and conservative therapy. Despite the multimodality treatments for BCLM, patients with this condition have a poor prognosis with a median survival of 24–33 months [6,7]. Hepatic resection in selected patients with BCLM showed improved outcomes, with a 5-year survival ranging from 16%–61% [8–21]. The role of liver resection in BCLM cases is still controversial. The aim of this paper was to review the outcomes of selected patients with BCLM after hepatic resection at a single center.
METHODS
Patients selection
Patients without extrahepatic disease findings in imaging studies, such as computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging, bone scintigraphy, and positron emission tomography-CT (PET-CT), were selected for hepatic resection. If R0 resection was available and there was a low operative risk according to American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I, II during preoperative tests, the patient underwent surgery. This retrospective study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Pusan National University Hospital Clinical Trial Center (IRB No. H-1702-010-052), and written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Postoperative follow-up schedule
Patients underwent a follow-up examination every 6 months, which included the following examinations: physical and laboratory testing (serology, liver function test, and tumor marker test) and radiographic examination (chest X-ray scan, ultrasound, mammography, and bone scintigraphy). CT and PET-CT scans were analyzed if any abnormal findings were identified during the radiographic examination.
Statistical analysis
The comparison of overall survival was analyzed by the log rank test. P-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS ver. 23.0 for Windows (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
RESULTS
Six patients who underwent hepatic resection for BCLM between November 2011 and January 2014. The aim of surgery was to achieve resection with an R0 margin. The median follow-up periods was 42.2 months. The initial diagnosis of all patients were infiltrative ductal carcinoma. Three of the patients underwent breast conserving surgery. Breast cancer lymph node metastases were found in four patients. Two patients yielded negative results for hormone receptors (estrogen receptor [ER] and progesterone receptor). All patients, except for the patient with synchronous metastases, received adjuvant therapy following breast cancer surgery depending on the hormone receptor status and tumor stage (Table 1). One of the patients (case 2) had synchronous metastases, whereas the remaining five patients had metachronous metastases. The time interval between the initial diagnosis of breast cancer and detection of liver metastases in the patients, excluding the one patient with synchronous metastases, was 55.2 months. Major liver resection (more than three segments) was performed in four patients, and radiofrequency ablation was performed in one patient who had a recurrence of hepatic metastases. All patients received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy following hepatic resection. Cases 2, 5, and 6 were human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive. Trastuzumab was administered after hepatic resection in cases 2 and 5; however, case 6 did not receive trastuzumab treatment owing to liver metastases that were found during adjuvant therapy of trastuzumab. Cases 1, 3, and 4 were administered cytotoxic agents following hepatic resection. Hormone receptor status differed between the primary breast tumor and liver metastases, but no difference was observed for HER2 status. Case 5 was diagnosed as perineural invasion (PNI) positive after analyses of the resected liver specimen, and this patient showed an earlier and more aggressive pattern of recurrence. The first site for recurrence after hepatic resection was liver, and then metastases in other organs were detected in the imaging studies (Table 2). The 1-year and 3-year overall survival rates and disease-free survival rates after hepatic resection were 100% and 83.3%, and 66.7% and 50.0%, respectively (Fig. 1).
DISCUSSION
The liver is the primary metastatic site in 12%–15% of patients with breast cancer, but isolated liver metastasis occurs in approximately 5% of patients. There are many retrospective, non-randomized studies that reported an improvement in the survival of patients who underwent liver resection for BCLM, compared with those who only received systemic treatment. Five-year survival rates following liver resection have been reported to be between 16% and 61% [6,7,21], and hepatic resection for BCLM may be an option in the multimodality treatment of BCLM.
In contrast to the well-described guidelines for hepatic resection of colorectal cancer liver metastasis, guidelines for hepatic resection of BCLM are mainly based on individual institutional and personal experience. Furthermore, the data hepatic resection of BCLM is limited because the numbers of available retrospective reports and enrolled patients are less. Researchers agree that curative hepatic resection for BCLM may be limited to isolated hepatic metastases and in patients with low operative risk. Recently, systemic review reported by Yoo et al. [22] described that liver resection for BCLM should be considered in patients with isolated liver metastases as the evidence suggests that their survival is improved compared to chemotherapy alone, and this study reported that the median 1- and 3-year overall survival were 90% and 56%, respectively. Our study satisfied these conditions, as can be seen with the relatively high survival rate observed after liver resection. The 1-year and 3-year overall survival rates and disease-free survival rates after hepatic resection were 100% and 83.3%, and 66.7% and 50.0%, respectively.
Although variable prognostic factors (patient age, number and size of metastases, lymph node infiltration, stage of primary disease, prior local recurrence of the primary tumor, and clear resection margin of metastatic lesion) have been suggested in some reports, many authors describe the importance of hormone receptor status as a prognostic factor for the primary tumor after complete resection of BCLM [12,17,20]. Golse and Adam [23] suggested that the best results after the resection of BCLM are achieved after applying selection criteria based on small metastases (< 4–5 cm), minor hepatectomy, radical resection (ideally R0, or R1), stable disease after neoadjuvant therapy, and a delay between primary and secondary lesions longer than 1 or 2 years. Howerver, the age of the patient, her hormone receptor status, and HER2 overexpression are not strong predictors of overall survival [23]. In our study, time to recurrence was relatively short if the metastatic lesion was larger than 5 cm, or there were multiple lesions (cases 1, 3, and 5). Case 5 was diagnosed as PNI positive after analyses of the resected liver specimen, and this case who was PNI-positive, not only showed early recurrence, but also showed more aggressive disease course. Koca et al. [24] described that grade III, perineural invasion, and lymph node were significantly associated with disease free survival, and the presence of PNI was found to have borderline significance on overall survival. However, we could not analyze the prognostic factors following hepatic resection owing to the small number of patients. There was a significant difference in hormone receptors between the resected liver specimens and primary breast tumors, but no difference in the HER2 status. Therefore, targeted therapy for HER2 should be continued if the metastases are positive for HER2 receptors in the resected liver specimen. Similarly, hormone therapy should be continued if the metastatic lesion is hormone positive. Recently, Spolverato et al. [25] reported that liver resection plus conventional systemic therapy was more cost effective for patients with ER-positive than systemic therapy alone. However, for patients with HER2 overexpression, liver resection plus systemic therapy that included trastuzumab had a cost-effectiveness that was comparable to conventional systemic therapy alone [25].
Some studies have reported that the presence of extrahepatic metastatic lesions was a significant prognostic factor for breast cancer [26,27]. The 1-year and 3-year survival rates of patients with extrahepatic metastases were 60.0% and 20.0%, respectively [26]. In this study, liver metastases were restricted to cases where no other distant or extrahepatic metastases were present, and the 1-year and 3-year overall survival rates after hepatic resection were 100% and 83.3%, respectively. We think that surgical treatment of the liver metastases in breast cancer should be considered in carefully selected patients.
This study had some limitations. First, this was a retrospective study. Second, owing to the small numbers of patients, no statistical comparisons could be made. Although this study contains a small number of patients and has limitations, it suggests that surgery in patients with liver metastases, without extrahepatic metastases, can result in a good prognosis.
Curative resection of BCLM may be considered a multimodal treatment of the metastatic disease. It has benefits for a distinct set of patients, and the criteria for patient selection should be further investigated.
Notes
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by clinical research grant from Pusan National University Hospital 2016.