Clin Shoulder Elbow Search

CLOSE


Clin Shoulder Elbow > Volume 15(2); 2012 > Article
Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow 2012;15(2):86-90.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5397/CiSE.2012.15.2.86    Published online December 31, 2012.
Clinical Results after Repair of Rotator Cuff Tear in Patients with Accompanying AC Joint Pathology: Clinical Comparison of Non-operative Treatment
Moon Jib Yoo, Joong Bae Seo, Dae Hee Lee, Sung Jin Kim
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea. ssjb1990@dku.edu
회전근개 파열과 동반된 견봉 쇄골 관절 병변이 회전근개 봉합술 후 결과에 미치는 영향
유문집·서중배·이대희·김성진
단국대학교 의과대학 정형외과학교실
Abstract
PURPOSE
We studied the need for distal clavicle resection by comparing rotator cuff tear patients who underwent non-surgical treatment with and without acromioclavicular joint pathology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 45 cases that had been under follow up care for at least 9 months after receiving rotator cuff repair in our hospital between Jan. 2005 and Jun. 2011 had been studied. Acromioclavicular joint pathology group and control group were classified by physical examination and MRI findings. The temporal changes in shoulder joint abduction, internal and external rotation strength, ASES and KSS score of the two groups were measured and analyzed.
RESULTS
The acromioclavicular joint pathology complicated rotator cuff injury group's strength measurements for abduction, internal rotation, external rotation were each 8.05 (+/-4.54), 11.33 (+/-6.05), 10.24 (+/-5.27) preoperatively and improved to 13.26 (+/-5.50), 17.51 (+/-6.80), 15.60 (+/-5.37) post operatively while the KSS score and ASES score were each 49.07 (+/-15.28) and 48.65 (+/-13.27) preoperatively, improving to 84.48 (+/-10.96) and 84.65. (+/-9.86). The measurements for the group without complicating acromioclavicular pathology are as follows. The strength for abduction, internal rotation, external rotation was each 6.42 (+/-3.11), 7.59 (+/-4.81) and 7.93 (+/-4.49) preoperatively, improving to 15.85 (+/-7.35), 19.18 (+/-9.14), 16.95 (+/-5.70) post operatively, while the KSS score and ASES score each went from 42.12 (+/-6.43) and 41.37 (+/-7.42) to 83.44 (+/-6.30) and 83.17 (+/-7.01) respectively. The measurements for the two groups, however, did not show a statistically significant difference (p>0.05).
CONCLUSION
Analysis of the rotator cuff injury groups with and without AC joint pathology showed that both groups had improved strength, ASES and KSS scores with no statistical difference difference among the groups. As such, it thought that conservative treatment is an acceptable alternative to distal clavicle resection.
Key Words: Rotator cuff tear; Acromioclavicular joint pathology; Rotator cuff repair
TOOLS
Share :
Facebook Twitter Linked In Google+ Line it
METRICS Graph View
  • 1 Crossref
  •    
  • 5,644 View
  • 45 Download
Related articles in Clin Should Elbow


ABOUT
ARTICLE CATEGORY

Browse all articles >

BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS
Editorial Office
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital,
#6603, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Korea
Tel: +82-2-3410-1854    Fax: +82-2-3410-0061    E-mail: journal@cisejournal.org                

Copyright © 2021 by Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next